Deployment Labs
Module 5 · Lesson 3 of 5 · 10 min

Getting more from the bottleneck

Never let it idle, never feed it bad work, and take everything else off its plate.

Improve has two steps, both from Goldratt's Theory of Constraints. The first is to get more out of the bottleneck with what you already have. The redesign in lesson 1 was the biggest part of it. This lesson covers the rest, and how you'll know whether any of it worked.

An hour lost there is lost everywhere

Module 1 showed that an hour saved anywhere but the bottleneck is a mirage. The other side of that idea is just as important. An hour lost at the bottleneck is an hour lost for the whole organisation, because nothing downstream can make it up and nothing upstream can get round it.

If the estimator spends twenty minutes chasing a missing specification, no amount of speed in sales gets that quote out sooner. That makes the bottleneck's time the most valuable time you have, even though it's rarely the best paid. Most organisations treat it like everyone else's: they fill it with meetings, interruptions and work that came in half-finished.

MONTUEWEDTHUFRIBottleneck workWaitingBad inputsOther tasksOUT OF THE BOTTLENECK42a weekNothing else on its plate: move it off
Fig. 5.4A bottleneck's week. Less than half of it is the work only it can do. A buffer fills the waiting, a check before it stops bad inputs, and other tasks move off. Output rises without anyone working longer. Illustrative.

Four ways to get more from it

Each one is cheap, and none of them asks the people at the bottleneck to work harder.

  1. Never let it idle. Keep a small buffer of ready work in front of it, so it never waits for the next item. Cover its breaks and absences. Keep its core hours clear of meetings that aren't its work. A day of work waiting is usually enough; much more than that is a pile, which is the next lesson.
  2. Only good work reaches it. Check quality before the bottleneck, not at it. An incomplete request caught upstream costs a few minutes of someone else's time. Caught at the bottleneck, it costs the hours you can least afford. Write down what “complete” means for work arriving there, and send anything short of it back. With AI speeding up the steps before it, this matters more, because unchecked AI output lands here. The output standard you set in module 2 is the rule.
  3. Take everything else off its plate. That's your redesign canvas: everything eliminated, simplified or moved to people with spare capacity.
  4. Aim AI at the bottleneck step itself. This is the one place AI's speed is never a mirage. An approved tool on the bottleneck's own work, with the person there checking what it produces, adds output to the whole organisation.
Goldratt's words for these steps

In the Theory of Constraints, getting the most from the bottleneck is called exploiting it, and pacing everything else to it is called subordinating. The framework uses plain words because everyone in the organisation needs to understand them. The next step in Goldratt's sequence, adding capacity, usually costs money. In the framework, that's Build.

Estimate what each move gives back below. Moves three and four come from your redesign canvas. With your prediction from module 4, the builder turns the hours into output and shows how much of your predicted rise the plan covers.

BuildGet more from the bottleneck
Your bottleneckNot named yet. Name it in module 4 or work through an example below.

Tick each move you'll make, and estimate what it gives back. The total goes on your plan as the hours you expect to free at the bottleneck each week.

  1. 1. Never let it idle+0 h

    An hour the bottleneck waits for work, covers a gap or sits in the wrong meeting is an hour the whole organisation loses.

  2. 2. Only good work reaches it+0 h

    Every incomplete or wrong input the bottleneck handles uses its scarcest hours. Check quality before it, not at it.

  3. 3. Take everything else off its plate+0 h

    Eliminate, simplify or move anything that isn't truly bottleneck work.

    The redesign canvas in lesson 1 works this out task by task. Until then, estimate it here.

  4. 4. Aim AI at the bottleneck step itself+0 h

    An approved tool on the step that limits everything, with a person checking the output.

    The redesign canvas in lesson 1 works this out task by task. Until then, estimate it here.

Expected hours freed at the bottleneck
0hours a week
Idle 0Bad inputs 0Off its plate 0AI at the step 0

Add how many bottleneck hours one item takes, to turn hours into output.

With a written prediction from module 4, this shows how much of the predicted rise the plan covers.

Estimates, not results. Freed hours only count once they're spent on the bottleneck's own work, and the checks every two weeks show whether they were.

Saved to your improvement plan
ScenarioMonday mornings

The bottleneck lead looks at the estimator's week. Monday mornings go on the weekly sales meeting. On Tuesdays the estimator waits until noon, because sales sends quote requests in one batch after its own team meeting. By Thursday there's a backlog.

Share of the bottleneck's week spent on its own work48%

What do you do?

Illustrative. The meter shows the direction things move, not a measured value.

How you'll know: a check every two weeks

During the first loop, the bottleneck lead checks the handoffs into and out of the bottleneck every two weeks. After the first loop, it's monthly. The check is short and always looks at the same things:

  • output at the bottleneck, in the aim's unit
  • how long work takes to get through it
  • rework at the bottleneck and at the step after it
  • whether work arrives complete, and whether the queue is under its cap
  • whether something else is now what everything waits on

Expect the early dip you wrote into your prediction. Changing how work is done slows it down before it speeds it up, so don't read the first checks as failure until the measurement window has closed.

Improve's three exits

When the window closes, the bottleneck lead re-measures against the prediction, and Improve ends one of three ways. This is what makes Improve a move with an end, rather than a programme that drifts.

Try itImprove's three exits

The measurement window has closed and the bottleneck lead re-measures. Move the level to see which way Improve goes.

Day 0
Success
Predicted

Short of the success line by 4 quotes a week. Is closing the gap worth paying for?

  1. Exit 1
    It moved

    Go back to Find. Fixing one bottleneck exposes the next, so name it. A new bottleneck can be named at any check.

  2. Exit 2
    It didn't move, and the gap is worth paying for

    Raise it at the front door for Build, with what you learned. Redesign and approved tools have now been tried. Module 6

  3. Exit 3
    It didn't move, and it isn't worth paying for

    Keep improving, or accept the level and name the next bottleneck.

Example prediction: 22 → 35 quotes a week, success at 30, over days 60–90. Write your own in module 4.
The idea

Guard the bottleneck's hours: never idle, never fed bad work, nothing else on its plate.

CheckQuick check

At the day-56 check, quotes are up from 22 to 26 a week. You predicted 35 over days 60 to 90, and your kill criterion is no gain by day 60. What now?

DoBefore the next lesson
0 of 4 done · saved in this browser
Finished this lesson?

Mark it complete. Your answers are already saved in this browser.